Netiquette rules indicate that, when posting to a chat room, an old thread should be presented with much pomp and circumstance, if at all.
A few months into my Internet initiation, I learned to "Bump".
It is a polite way of reintroducing a topic that has been lying fallow on the site for some time and that may, or may not, be dead.
The only way to find out if a thread it truly old hat is to bump it and to see what happens.
It is a practice that rarely goes un-noticed and today capital letters were used to indicate a certain displeasure by one poster who wondered at the value of trying to recussitate a topic that did not seem to hold much interest for them in the first place.
I have to admit I find all this bowing and scraping to people one will never meet a bit rich.
I find myself wondering about who thinks up the rules...
and even more intriguing, why so many people have internalised them so rigidly.
Perhaps this thought process is a hang over from years spent teaching and realising that any group dynamic has layers of interaction that are virtually imperceptible.
Until something unexpected happens, that is, and many forces, often unconscious and based on firmly held beliefs that seem to come from nowhere, emerge to find an often vigorous expression.
People are passionate.
I certainly shall think twice before "bumping " again soon...
But could this be a subtle erosion of freedom of speech?