tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9072986020953209374.post9110214346652220582..comments2023-10-04T15:13:32.116+01:00Comments on Writing in a Twist: White Flowers and BokehTales from the Birch Wood.http://www.blogger.com/profile/15427603252937311851noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9072986020953209374.post-69941068873018831352011-09-05T10:57:54.098+01:002011-09-05T10:57:54.098+01:00Ahh. Narrow / shallow DOF. Good use of it. I...Ahh. Narrow / shallow DOF. Good use of it. I'd always thought that bokeh were artifacts of the lens aperture, thus were hexagonal or whatever, reflecting the shutter shape.David T. Macknethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03074123750929335716noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9072986020953209374.post-4218636905477704132011-09-04T16:52:36.279+01:002011-09-04T16:52:36.279+01:00I've taken some time to think about this.
Bok...I've taken some time to think about this.<br /><br />Bokeh no longer needs to be circles of confusion, but can be objects that form mysterious shapes due to a shallow depth of field.<br /><br />Purists would probably object to the use of "bokeh". If you have seen the film "Limitless" it has some very fine grainy blurred effects, which I (possibly mistakenly?) refer to as bokeh.<br /><br /><br />"Shallow depth of field effects" is a bit long winded.Tales from the Birch Wood.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15427603252937311851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9072986020953209374.post-84379343382340120432011-07-29T17:31:58.663+01:002011-07-29T17:31:58.663+01:00Didn't see any bokeh, but sure liked the dew. ...Didn't see any bokeh, but sure liked the dew. :)David T. Macknethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03074123750929335716noreply@blogger.com